The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
So we shouldn't expect sensible campaign strategies along the lines of: "Let's be reasonable and use international mediators to fix the boundaries permanently. It's not worth the disruption and bloodshed for a tiny sliver of territory"
-
Gaybutton
- Posts: 24325
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Thailand
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
Cambodia continues attacks on Thailand as curfew expanded
December 14, 2025
Cambodia has continued its attacks along the Thai border, prompting Thailand to retaliate and extend curfews in affected provinces, according to the Thai Ministry of Defence.
RAdm Surasant Kongsiri, spokesman for the Defence Ministry, said on Sunday morning that Thailand conducted its retaliations in accordance with the internationally recognised rule of engagement and international practices.
According to him, from 10pm Saturday to 1am Sunday Cambodia sent drones into Trat province in eastern Thailand and at 4.15am fired rockets and shells into the northeastern province of Si Sa Ket. At 5.15am Cambodia resumed attacks all along the border with Thailand’s Northeast and East.
“Cambodia has not ceased fire as it claimed,” RAdm Surasant said, referring to the report that Cambodia agreed with a proposal from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim who chairs the Association of Southeast Asian Nations for Thailand and Cambodia to cease fire by 10pm on Saturday.
He added that the Royal Thai Navy would impose a curfew from 7pm to 5am in four districts of Trat — Khlong Yai, Bo Rai, Khao Saming and Muang. Earlier a curfew was imposed in four districts of Sa Kaeo in the East.
Deputy army spokesman Col Richa Suksuvanont said Thai forces maintained full control of key border areas, including Chong An Ma (Hill 677) in Ubon Ratchathani, Sam Tae in Si Sa Ket, several passes in Surin, and Ban Nong Ya Kaew in Sa Kaeo.
Thai troops, he said, had secured the Prasat Khana temple ruins in Surin, where they found trenches previously dug by Cambodian forces. He described this as a serious breach of international principles.
Col Richa also outlined Cambodian military losses. He estimated that Cambodia lost at least 221 soldiers, 51 military bases, a BM-21multiple rocket launcher, 10 tanks, nine armoured vehicles, four anti-aircraft systems, seven mortars, five anti-drone facilities, 68 drones and three communication towers.
He said the Thai army remained determined to reclaim encroached border areas and neutralise threats to Thai forces and civilians.
“The army is still determined to retrieve previously encroached border areas and disable the military capabilities of Cambodia which evidently attacks and harms Thai military and people. This refers to military personnel, weapons, military bases and facilities,” Col Richa said.
Royal Thai Navy assistant spokesman Capt Nara Khunthothom said naval forces, supported by fighter jets, had retaken the Ban Chamrak area in Trat, which Cambodia had illegally occupied. Clashes continued as Cambodian troops resisted, he said, adding that the curfew was intended to protect Thai communities from ongoing attacks.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... w-expanded
_____________________________________________________________________________
Thai armed forces say Cambodia did not cease fire; estimate 221 Cambodian troops killed
December 14, 2025
Thai armed forces say Cambodia kept firing BM-21 rockets and artillery after a 10pm ceasefire claim, and estimate 221 Cambodian troops killed so far.
The Royal Thai Army, Royal Thai Navy and Royal Thai Air Force said on Sunday (December 14, 2025) that Cambodia did not cease fire at 10pm as claimed, and that attacks on multiple Thai border areas continued overnight. They also estimated that 221 Cambodian troops have been killed since fighting began on December 8, 2025.
Thai military says BM-21 rockets and artillery fire continued overnight
In their daily update on the Thai–Cambodian border situation, the three services held a joint press briefing at the Royal Thai Army Radio Station, saying Cambodian forces continued shelling Thai border areas with BM-21 rockets and artillery from 10pm on Saturday until dawn, with no sign of a ceasefire.
Rear Adm Surasant Kongsiri said Cambodia continued to bombard Thai border areas with heavy weapons, requiring Thai forces to respond in line with rules of engagement and international practice.
Drones reported entering Thai airspace
Surasant said Cambodian surveillance drones were detected flying into Thai airspace from 10pm on Saturday, and that the Thai military intercepted the drones. He added that the Royal Thai Navy also intercepted surveillance drones.
He said that at around 4am on Sunday, Cambodia stepped up BM-21 rocket and artillery fire into border areas in Si Sa Ket and elsewhere.
Thailand says it has not rejected talks, but wants hostile actions to end first
“Thailand has not rejected talks or diplomacy. However, in recent efforts, negotiations could not proceed because Cambodia was not ready to negotiate and the threat remains. We need Cambodia to end its hostile actions first in order to move towards genuine negotiations. Thailand has also asked the international community to understand the real situation on the ground to protect civilians, reduce tensions, and respect state sovereignty,” Surasant said.
Army says Prasat Khana area in Surin under Thai control
Col Ritcha Suksuwanont, deputy spokesman for the Royal Thai Army, said areas seized and controlled by the army had not changed significantly.
He added that Thai troops had taken full control of the Prasat Khana area in Surin, saying it was found Cambodian troops had used the historical site on Thai territory as a military base and dug trenches, which he said violated international principles on protecting historical sites.
Thai army cites casualty estimate and equipment destroyed
Ritcha said the army estimated 221 Cambodian troops had been killed since clashes erupted on December 8, 2025.
He said Thai forces had also destroyed 51 Cambodian military bases, one BM-21 rocket launcher, 10 tanks, nine armoured vehicles, four anti-aircraft guns, seven artillery and mortar guns, five anti-drone systems, 68 drones and three cell towers.
He added that the army continues to pursue two operational objectives: (1) to re-establish the border line that it says was encroached upon, and (2) to degrade Cambodia’s military capability so it is rendered ineffective, including personnel, weaponry, military positions and supporting infrastructure.
Navy says Thai forces retook Ban Cham Rat in Trat
Capt Nara Khunthotham, assistant spokesman for the Royal Thai Navy, said Ban Cham Rat in Trat province—an area under the Navy’s responsibility—was a key objective that Thai forces had been trying to retake after what he described as long-standing Cambodian encroachment.
He said Thai forces regained control of the area with earlier air support from the Royal Thai Air Force, followed by a ground manoeuvre by Marine units. He said Cambodian forces responded with heavy fire, but Thai forces ultimately re-established security and raised the national flag to demonstrate Thailand’s sovereignty over the area.
“I want to stress that this point is Thai sovereign territory that Cambodia invaded from the outset. Thailand has retaken it, but Cambodia’s retaliatory attacks have not eased. Cambodia continues to launch attacks, and Thai forces must continue operations to contain the ongoing threat from the opposing side,” Capt Nara said.
Curfew in Trat
Capt Nara said the curfew announced in Trat was necessary for public safety. Residents who need to leave their homes during curfew hours can seek permission and explain their reasons to officials, he said, adding that authorities would listen and provide assistance.
https://www.nationthailand.com/news/asean/40059754
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Roughly 7000 Thais Stranded in Poipet, Cambodia, as Thailand Accuses Cambodia of Human Rights Violations For Refusing Their Return
By Adam Judd
December 14, 2025
Thailand has accused Cambodia of violating international human rights law by blocking up to 7,000 Thai nationals from returning home from the border town of Poipet, despite a prior agreement to reopen the crossing.
Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow stated that Cambodia’s decision to indefinitely postpone the border reopening constitutes a breach of humanitarian principles and international law. “Preventing citizens from returning to their homeland is a fundamental violation of human rights,” he said, adding that Thailand had facilitated the unconditional repatriation of over 7,000 Cambodian nationals earlier in the week.
The dispute centres on the Poipet checkpoint, opposite Thailand’s Khlong Luek crossing in Sa Kaeo province. Cambodian authorities had initially agreed to open the border on Saturday afternoon for a limited period to allow Thai workers – many employed in Poipet’s casinos – to cross back. However, former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, a influential figure as president of the Senate, announced the suspension of all cross-border movements, citing safety concerns amid ongoing military clashes.
Reports indicate that thousands of Thais gathered at the checkpoint with their belongings, only to be turned away. Cambodian officials cited security risks from escalating hostilities along disputed border areas as the reason for the indefinite closure.
The standoff comes against the backdrop of renewed armed conflict between the two neighbours, which flared up again in December after a brief ceasefire. Clashes have involved artillery, airstrikes, and ground engagements in contested zones, with both sides reporting casualties and accusing the other of aggression.
Thailand maintains it has never restricted Cambodian citizens wishing to return home, positioning the issue as a humanitarian concern separate from the military dispute. Diplomatic efforts continue, with negotiations ongoing to resolve the civilian repatriation impasse.
International observers are monitoring the situation closely, as the border closure disrupts lives and trade in a region already strained by longstanding territorial disputes.
https://thepattayanews.com/2025/12/14/r ... ir-return/
December 14, 2025
Cambodia has continued its attacks along the Thai border, prompting Thailand to retaliate and extend curfews in affected provinces, according to the Thai Ministry of Defence.
RAdm Surasant Kongsiri, spokesman for the Defence Ministry, said on Sunday morning that Thailand conducted its retaliations in accordance with the internationally recognised rule of engagement and international practices.
According to him, from 10pm Saturday to 1am Sunday Cambodia sent drones into Trat province in eastern Thailand and at 4.15am fired rockets and shells into the northeastern province of Si Sa Ket. At 5.15am Cambodia resumed attacks all along the border with Thailand’s Northeast and East.
“Cambodia has not ceased fire as it claimed,” RAdm Surasant said, referring to the report that Cambodia agreed with a proposal from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim who chairs the Association of Southeast Asian Nations for Thailand and Cambodia to cease fire by 10pm on Saturday.
He added that the Royal Thai Navy would impose a curfew from 7pm to 5am in four districts of Trat — Khlong Yai, Bo Rai, Khao Saming and Muang. Earlier a curfew was imposed in four districts of Sa Kaeo in the East.
Deputy army spokesman Col Richa Suksuvanont said Thai forces maintained full control of key border areas, including Chong An Ma (Hill 677) in Ubon Ratchathani, Sam Tae in Si Sa Ket, several passes in Surin, and Ban Nong Ya Kaew in Sa Kaeo.
Thai troops, he said, had secured the Prasat Khana temple ruins in Surin, where they found trenches previously dug by Cambodian forces. He described this as a serious breach of international principles.
Col Richa also outlined Cambodian military losses. He estimated that Cambodia lost at least 221 soldiers, 51 military bases, a BM-21multiple rocket launcher, 10 tanks, nine armoured vehicles, four anti-aircraft systems, seven mortars, five anti-drone facilities, 68 drones and three communication towers.
He said the Thai army remained determined to reclaim encroached border areas and neutralise threats to Thai forces and civilians.
“The army is still determined to retrieve previously encroached border areas and disable the military capabilities of Cambodia which evidently attacks and harms Thai military and people. This refers to military personnel, weapons, military bases and facilities,” Col Richa said.
Royal Thai Navy assistant spokesman Capt Nara Khunthothom said naval forces, supported by fighter jets, had retaken the Ban Chamrak area in Trat, which Cambodia had illegally occupied. Clashes continued as Cambodian troops resisted, he said, adding that the curfew was intended to protect Thai communities from ongoing attacks.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... w-expanded
_____________________________________________________________________________
Thai armed forces say Cambodia did not cease fire; estimate 221 Cambodian troops killed
December 14, 2025
Thai armed forces say Cambodia kept firing BM-21 rockets and artillery after a 10pm ceasefire claim, and estimate 221 Cambodian troops killed so far.
The Royal Thai Army, Royal Thai Navy and Royal Thai Air Force said on Sunday (December 14, 2025) that Cambodia did not cease fire at 10pm as claimed, and that attacks on multiple Thai border areas continued overnight. They also estimated that 221 Cambodian troops have been killed since fighting began on December 8, 2025.
Thai military says BM-21 rockets and artillery fire continued overnight
In their daily update on the Thai–Cambodian border situation, the three services held a joint press briefing at the Royal Thai Army Radio Station, saying Cambodian forces continued shelling Thai border areas with BM-21 rockets and artillery from 10pm on Saturday until dawn, with no sign of a ceasefire.
Rear Adm Surasant Kongsiri said Cambodia continued to bombard Thai border areas with heavy weapons, requiring Thai forces to respond in line with rules of engagement and international practice.
Drones reported entering Thai airspace
Surasant said Cambodian surveillance drones were detected flying into Thai airspace from 10pm on Saturday, and that the Thai military intercepted the drones. He added that the Royal Thai Navy also intercepted surveillance drones.
He said that at around 4am on Sunday, Cambodia stepped up BM-21 rocket and artillery fire into border areas in Si Sa Ket and elsewhere.
Thailand says it has not rejected talks, but wants hostile actions to end first
“Thailand has not rejected talks or diplomacy. However, in recent efforts, negotiations could not proceed because Cambodia was not ready to negotiate and the threat remains. We need Cambodia to end its hostile actions first in order to move towards genuine negotiations. Thailand has also asked the international community to understand the real situation on the ground to protect civilians, reduce tensions, and respect state sovereignty,” Surasant said.
Army says Prasat Khana area in Surin under Thai control
Col Ritcha Suksuwanont, deputy spokesman for the Royal Thai Army, said areas seized and controlled by the army had not changed significantly.
He added that Thai troops had taken full control of the Prasat Khana area in Surin, saying it was found Cambodian troops had used the historical site on Thai territory as a military base and dug trenches, which he said violated international principles on protecting historical sites.
Thai army cites casualty estimate and equipment destroyed
Ritcha said the army estimated 221 Cambodian troops had been killed since clashes erupted on December 8, 2025.
He said Thai forces had also destroyed 51 Cambodian military bases, one BM-21 rocket launcher, 10 tanks, nine armoured vehicles, four anti-aircraft guns, seven artillery and mortar guns, five anti-drone systems, 68 drones and three cell towers.
He added that the army continues to pursue two operational objectives: (1) to re-establish the border line that it says was encroached upon, and (2) to degrade Cambodia’s military capability so it is rendered ineffective, including personnel, weaponry, military positions and supporting infrastructure.
Navy says Thai forces retook Ban Cham Rat in Trat
Capt Nara Khunthotham, assistant spokesman for the Royal Thai Navy, said Ban Cham Rat in Trat province—an area under the Navy’s responsibility—was a key objective that Thai forces had been trying to retake after what he described as long-standing Cambodian encroachment.
He said Thai forces regained control of the area with earlier air support from the Royal Thai Air Force, followed by a ground manoeuvre by Marine units. He said Cambodian forces responded with heavy fire, but Thai forces ultimately re-established security and raised the national flag to demonstrate Thailand’s sovereignty over the area.
“I want to stress that this point is Thai sovereign territory that Cambodia invaded from the outset. Thailand has retaken it, but Cambodia’s retaliatory attacks have not eased. Cambodia continues to launch attacks, and Thai forces must continue operations to contain the ongoing threat from the opposing side,” Capt Nara said.
Curfew in Trat
Capt Nara said the curfew announced in Trat was necessary for public safety. Residents who need to leave their homes during curfew hours can seek permission and explain their reasons to officials, he said, adding that authorities would listen and provide assistance.
https://www.nationthailand.com/news/asean/40059754
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Roughly 7000 Thais Stranded in Poipet, Cambodia, as Thailand Accuses Cambodia of Human Rights Violations For Refusing Their Return
By Adam Judd
December 14, 2025
Thailand has accused Cambodia of violating international human rights law by blocking up to 7,000 Thai nationals from returning home from the border town of Poipet, despite a prior agreement to reopen the crossing.
Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow stated that Cambodia’s decision to indefinitely postpone the border reopening constitutes a breach of humanitarian principles and international law. “Preventing citizens from returning to their homeland is a fundamental violation of human rights,” he said, adding that Thailand had facilitated the unconditional repatriation of over 7,000 Cambodian nationals earlier in the week.
The dispute centres on the Poipet checkpoint, opposite Thailand’s Khlong Luek crossing in Sa Kaeo province. Cambodian authorities had initially agreed to open the border on Saturday afternoon for a limited period to allow Thai workers – many employed in Poipet’s casinos – to cross back. However, former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, a influential figure as president of the Senate, announced the suspension of all cross-border movements, citing safety concerns amid ongoing military clashes.
Reports indicate that thousands of Thais gathered at the checkpoint with their belongings, only to be turned away. Cambodian officials cited security risks from escalating hostilities along disputed border areas as the reason for the indefinite closure.
The standoff comes against the backdrop of renewed armed conflict between the two neighbours, which flared up again in December after a brief ceasefire. Clashes have involved artillery, airstrikes, and ground engagements in contested zones, with both sides reporting casualties and accusing the other of aggression.
Thailand maintains it has never restricted Cambodian citizens wishing to return home, positioning the issue as a humanitarian concern separate from the military dispute. Diplomatic efforts continue, with negotiations ongoing to resolve the civilian repatriation impasse.
International observers are monitoring the situation closely, as the border closure disrupts lives and trade in a region already strained by longstanding territorial disputes.
https://thepattayanews.com/2025/12/14/r ... ir-return/
-
Gaybutton
- Posts: 24325
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Thailand
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
The situation is serious enough as it is. I can only hope it won't escalate into something far more serious, but obviously that is a credible possibility. There is always the hope that cooler heads will prevail, but so far I'm not seeing anything to indicate there are any cooler heads on either side.
-
Gaybutton
- Posts: 24325
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Thailand
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
'Gulf closure' planned to weaken Cambodia’s warfare capabilities
December 14, 2025
The Royal Thai Armed Forces Headquarters has proposed that the National Security Council (NSC) block oil and military supplies to Cambodia via the Gulf of Thailand amid ongoing hostilities.
An urgent letter from armed forces chiefs, circulated online on Sunday, shows a request for the Defence Ministry to submit an immediate proposal to the NSC to shut the gulf to oil and warfare-related supplies destined for Cambodia.
According to the proposal, the NSC would order the Thai Maritime Enforcement Command Centre (Thai-MECC) to intercept and block oil and warfare-related supplies carried by all vessels, including commercial ships and fishing boats, departing Thai waters for Cambodia.
Capt Panupan Rakkaew, a coordinator at Thai-MECC, said the centre has already drafted a related order to enforce the supply blockade. He added that the NSC could issue such an order under the Maritime National Interests Protection Act.
Capt Nara Khunthothom, assistant spokesman for the Royal Thai Navy, said the NSC would have a meeting and discuss the issue on Monday.
On the agenda were requests for the NSC to suspend export of oil and warfare-related supplies to Cambodia and for Thai-MECC to watch out for any vessels that would deliver oil and warfare-related supplies to Cambodia, he said.
In addition, Thai-MECC would issue a warning that there were high risks in the sea off Cambodian ports because Cambodian forces were firing their weapons indiscriminately, he said.
"There will not be the actual word of maritime blockade," Capt Nara said.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... pabilities
December 14, 2025
The Royal Thai Armed Forces Headquarters has proposed that the National Security Council (NSC) block oil and military supplies to Cambodia via the Gulf of Thailand amid ongoing hostilities.
An urgent letter from armed forces chiefs, circulated online on Sunday, shows a request for the Defence Ministry to submit an immediate proposal to the NSC to shut the gulf to oil and warfare-related supplies destined for Cambodia.
According to the proposal, the NSC would order the Thai Maritime Enforcement Command Centre (Thai-MECC) to intercept and block oil and warfare-related supplies carried by all vessels, including commercial ships and fishing boats, departing Thai waters for Cambodia.
Capt Panupan Rakkaew, a coordinator at Thai-MECC, said the centre has already drafted a related order to enforce the supply blockade. He added that the NSC could issue such an order under the Maritime National Interests Protection Act.
Capt Nara Khunthothom, assistant spokesman for the Royal Thai Navy, said the NSC would have a meeting and discuss the issue on Monday.
On the agenda were requests for the NSC to suspend export of oil and warfare-related supplies to Cambodia and for Thai-MECC to watch out for any vessels that would deliver oil and warfare-related supplies to Cambodia, he said.
In addition, Thai-MECC would issue a warning that there were high risks in the sea off Cambodian ports because Cambodian forces were firing their weapons indiscriminately, he said.
"There will not be the actual word of maritime blockade," Capt Nara said.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... pabilities
-
Gaybutton
- Posts: 24325
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Thailand
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
While commercial flights between Thailand and Cambodia are still fully operating, I, for one, would not want to be on any of them. I would be worried about some military hothead shooting down a commercial civilian flight. There is nothing to indicate anything such as that is likely, but I don't discount the possibility.
______________________________________________________________
Thai airports tighten passenger screening, watch for foreign mercenaries
by Wassayos Ngamkham
December 15, 2025
Thai airports have been ordered to strictly screen all Cambodian nationals entering Thailand under the visa-free scheme and to also tighten checks against foreign mercenaries entering the country, amid the escalating conflict at the border.
The Immigration Bureau on Monday asked foreign tourists to understand the situation, which could result in congestion at passport control.
Enhanced security measures apply mainly at Suvarnabhumi, Don Mueang, Chiang Mai, Phuket and Hat Yai airports, Immigration Bureau spokesman Pol Maj Gen Choengron Rimpadee said.
Senior police were closely monitoring the situation he said, citing growing concern in the face of renewed and intense clashes between Thai and Cambodian forces following the collapse of the latest ceasefire.
There was a possibility that foreigners might exploit the visa-free entry scheme to carry out operations that threaten Thai security, Pol Maj Gen Choengron said. It was most unlikely that Cambodians would come here for tourism at this time, he said.
Cambodian nationals entering for valid business purposes are required to obtain proper visas from the Thai embassy.
Another focus group is passengers from eastern Europe and northern Asia, who might be hired as a mercenaries, or even as spies, Pol Maj Gen Choengron said.
The waiting time at immigration control queues could be extended from the usual 20 minutes to around 45 minutes. This would not affect Thai travellers. Commercial flights between Thailand and Cambodia were still operating as usual, Pol Maj Gen Choengron said.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... ercenaries
______________________________________________________________
Thai airports tighten passenger screening, watch for foreign mercenaries
by Wassayos Ngamkham
December 15, 2025
Thai airports have been ordered to strictly screen all Cambodian nationals entering Thailand under the visa-free scheme and to also tighten checks against foreign mercenaries entering the country, amid the escalating conflict at the border.
The Immigration Bureau on Monday asked foreign tourists to understand the situation, which could result in congestion at passport control.
Enhanced security measures apply mainly at Suvarnabhumi, Don Mueang, Chiang Mai, Phuket and Hat Yai airports, Immigration Bureau spokesman Pol Maj Gen Choengron Rimpadee said.
Senior police were closely monitoring the situation he said, citing growing concern in the face of renewed and intense clashes between Thai and Cambodian forces following the collapse of the latest ceasefire.
There was a possibility that foreigners might exploit the visa-free entry scheme to carry out operations that threaten Thai security, Pol Maj Gen Choengron said. It was most unlikely that Cambodians would come here for tourism at this time, he said.
Cambodian nationals entering for valid business purposes are required to obtain proper visas from the Thai embassy.
Another focus group is passengers from eastern Europe and northern Asia, who might be hired as a mercenaries, or even as spies, Pol Maj Gen Choengron said.
The waiting time at immigration control queues could be extended from the usual 20 minutes to around 45 minutes. This would not affect Thai travellers. Commercial flights between Thailand and Cambodia were still operating as usual, Pol Maj Gen Choengron said.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... ercenaries
-
Gaybutton
- Posts: 24325
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Thailand
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
4 more soldiers killed in border clashes with Cambodia, bringing total death toll to 21
by THE NATION
December 18, 2025
Royal Thai Army reports 4 more deaths in border clashes with Cambodia, total of 21 soldiers killed
The Royal Thai Army has confirmed the deaths of 4 more soldiers in the ongoing border conflict with Cambodia, bringing the total number of casualties to 21 since December 8, 2025.
Royal Thai Army on Wednesday, December 17, confirmed the deaths of 4 more soldiers in the ongoing conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, raising the total number of fatalities to 21 since the fighting began on December 8, 2025.
The latest fatalities are as follows:
Sgt. Maj. Samroeng Khlangprakhon
Affiliated with the 3rd Infantry Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment
Died in the battle at Hill 350, Prasat Takwai
Date of death: 16 December 2025
Private Phanupat Saorsa
Affiliated with the 3rd Infantry Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment
Died in the battle at Hill 350, Prasat Takwai
Date of death: 16 December 2025
Sgt. Maj. Pornsak Iamsa-ad
Affiliated with the 1st Infantry Battalion, 2nd Infantry Regiment (Royal Guard)
Died in the battle at Ban Nong Chan
Date of death: 17 December 2025
Private Wasan Khanhuathon
Affiliated with the 3rd Infantry Battalion, 13th Infantry Regiment
Died in the battle at Sam Tae
Date of death: 17 December 2025
The Royal Thai Army paid tribute to the brave soldiers who sacrificed their lives in the line of duty to protect the sovereignty of the nation. The army has vowed to provide the best possible support and welfare for the families of these fallen heroes.
https://www.nationthailand.com/news/general/40059959
_______________________
Air force jets strike Poipet
Cambodia slams Thai military action
December 19, 2025
The Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) has stepped up air operations along the Thai-Cambodian border, insisting the response is defensive and proportionate.
The RTAF confirmed that it had carried out air strikes using F-16 fighter jets to hit military targets outside the city of Poipet in Cambodia, after detecting the movement of heavy weapons in the area, particularly BM-21 multiple rocket launchers that have been repeatedly used in attacks on Thai territory.
AM Chakkrit Thammavichai, spokesman for the RTAF, said on Thursday that the operation took place earlier in the day at around 11am. The targets were an arms depot and logistics centre that were used to store BM-21 rockets, which Cambodian forces had previously employed in attacks against both Thai military units and civilian areas.
He said intelligence confirmed that BM-21 rockets were being transported in and out of the area, and that the site was not inhabited by civilians. This assessment led to the decision to conduct the air operation.
Footage of the strikes showed multiple secondary explosions, resulting from the destruction of BM-21 rockets stored inside the depot.
The air force stressed that there was no civilian damage and no unnecessary loss of life.
AM Chakkrit noted that BM-21 rockets continue to pose a serious threat to the lives and property of Thai citizens. The objective of the operation was therefore to degrade the enemy's offensive capability and reduce risks to innocent civilians.
Speaking after the F-16 strikes in Poipet, Defence Minister Gen Nattaphon Narkphanit insisted that the operations across seven provinces were proportionate acts of self-defence.
Thailand would continue such operations until Cambodia clearly and consistently ceases hostile actions, he said.
"Although the Cambodian government's media have said that Cambodia is ready to negotiate and wishes to cease fire, fighting continues along the frontline, with daily bombardments directed at our forces.
"If they wish to cease fire, then they should stop and withdraw the forces facing ours. We have no intention of pursuing or attacking as far as Phnom Penh. If they want a ceasefire, they must demonstrate it to us first," Gen Nattaphon said.
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul gave an interview regarding reports that China was preparing to send a special envoy for Asian affairs from its Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Thailand and Cambodia to act as a mediator in the Thai–Cambodian border conflict.
Asked whether Thailand had already been contacted, Mr Anutin said that he personally had not received any such approach, although there may have been communication through diplomatic channels.
When asked whether China would act as a mediator in the latest round of tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, Mr Anutin said this was unlikely.
On Thailand's position, he said that anyone seeking to engage in talks should urge Cambodia to stop firing at Thailand and to cease harming the country. Thailand, he stressed, has never initiated hostilities, but has merely defended itself and responded as necessary.
As of Thursday, 21 Thai soldiers had been killed in the clashes.
Meanwhile, Cambodia's Ministry of National Defence issued a statement to condemn the Thai military action, urging Thailand to immediately cease all "hostile activities", withdraw its forces from Cambodian territory, and refrain from acts of incursion and aggression.
"Cambodia calls on the international community to strongly condemn Thailand's violations of the Joint Declaration and its repeated war crimes and unlawful activities, and demands that Thailand take full responsibility for these actions," the ministry said.
Poipet Municipality in Cambodia denied reports in Thai media which claimed that troops and heavy weapons were deployed in the city.
The municipality's statement insisted Poipet is a commercial and economic hub, not a combat zone, and has no military bases or weapons stockpiles.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... ike-poipet
by THE NATION
December 18, 2025
Royal Thai Army reports 4 more deaths in border clashes with Cambodia, total of 21 soldiers killed
The Royal Thai Army has confirmed the deaths of 4 more soldiers in the ongoing border conflict with Cambodia, bringing the total number of casualties to 21 since December 8, 2025.
Royal Thai Army on Wednesday, December 17, confirmed the deaths of 4 more soldiers in the ongoing conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, raising the total number of fatalities to 21 since the fighting began on December 8, 2025.
The latest fatalities are as follows:
Sgt. Maj. Samroeng Khlangprakhon
Affiliated with the 3rd Infantry Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment
Died in the battle at Hill 350, Prasat Takwai
Date of death: 16 December 2025
Private Phanupat Saorsa
Affiliated with the 3rd Infantry Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment
Died in the battle at Hill 350, Prasat Takwai
Date of death: 16 December 2025
Sgt. Maj. Pornsak Iamsa-ad
Affiliated with the 1st Infantry Battalion, 2nd Infantry Regiment (Royal Guard)
Died in the battle at Ban Nong Chan
Date of death: 17 December 2025
Private Wasan Khanhuathon
Affiliated with the 3rd Infantry Battalion, 13th Infantry Regiment
Died in the battle at Sam Tae
Date of death: 17 December 2025
The Royal Thai Army paid tribute to the brave soldiers who sacrificed their lives in the line of duty to protect the sovereignty of the nation. The army has vowed to provide the best possible support and welfare for the families of these fallen heroes.
https://www.nationthailand.com/news/general/40059959
_______________________
Air force jets strike Poipet
Cambodia slams Thai military action
December 19, 2025
The Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) has stepped up air operations along the Thai-Cambodian border, insisting the response is defensive and proportionate.
The RTAF confirmed that it had carried out air strikes using F-16 fighter jets to hit military targets outside the city of Poipet in Cambodia, after detecting the movement of heavy weapons in the area, particularly BM-21 multiple rocket launchers that have been repeatedly used in attacks on Thai territory.
AM Chakkrit Thammavichai, spokesman for the RTAF, said on Thursday that the operation took place earlier in the day at around 11am. The targets were an arms depot and logistics centre that were used to store BM-21 rockets, which Cambodian forces had previously employed in attacks against both Thai military units and civilian areas.
He said intelligence confirmed that BM-21 rockets were being transported in and out of the area, and that the site was not inhabited by civilians. This assessment led to the decision to conduct the air operation.
Footage of the strikes showed multiple secondary explosions, resulting from the destruction of BM-21 rockets stored inside the depot.
The air force stressed that there was no civilian damage and no unnecessary loss of life.
AM Chakkrit noted that BM-21 rockets continue to pose a serious threat to the lives and property of Thai citizens. The objective of the operation was therefore to degrade the enemy's offensive capability and reduce risks to innocent civilians.
Speaking after the F-16 strikes in Poipet, Defence Minister Gen Nattaphon Narkphanit insisted that the operations across seven provinces were proportionate acts of self-defence.
Thailand would continue such operations until Cambodia clearly and consistently ceases hostile actions, he said.
"Although the Cambodian government's media have said that Cambodia is ready to negotiate and wishes to cease fire, fighting continues along the frontline, with daily bombardments directed at our forces.
"If they wish to cease fire, then they should stop and withdraw the forces facing ours. We have no intention of pursuing or attacking as far as Phnom Penh. If they want a ceasefire, they must demonstrate it to us first," Gen Nattaphon said.
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul gave an interview regarding reports that China was preparing to send a special envoy for Asian affairs from its Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Thailand and Cambodia to act as a mediator in the Thai–Cambodian border conflict.
Asked whether Thailand had already been contacted, Mr Anutin said that he personally had not received any such approach, although there may have been communication through diplomatic channels.
When asked whether China would act as a mediator in the latest round of tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, Mr Anutin said this was unlikely.
On Thailand's position, he said that anyone seeking to engage in talks should urge Cambodia to stop firing at Thailand and to cease harming the country. Thailand, he stressed, has never initiated hostilities, but has merely defended itself and responded as necessary.
As of Thursday, 21 Thai soldiers had been killed in the clashes.
Meanwhile, Cambodia's Ministry of National Defence issued a statement to condemn the Thai military action, urging Thailand to immediately cease all "hostile activities", withdraw its forces from Cambodian territory, and refrain from acts of incursion and aggression.
"Cambodia calls on the international community to strongly condemn Thailand's violations of the Joint Declaration and its repeated war crimes and unlawful activities, and demands that Thailand take full responsibility for these actions," the ministry said.
Poipet Municipality in Cambodia denied reports in Thai media which claimed that troops and heavy weapons were deployed in the city.
The municipality's statement insisted Poipet is a commercial and economic hub, not a combat zone, and has no military bases or weapons stockpiles.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... ike-poipet
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
"What is Thailand’s endgame in waging a border war with Cambodia?
A captured Thai armoured personnel carrier. Supplied
The unfolding developments along the Cambodia-Thailand border raise a fundamental question: what is Thailand’s true endgame in escalating aggression against Cambodia?
Viewed objectively, Thailand’s actions amount to a unilateral use of force driven less by legitimate security concerns or self-defence than by domestic political calculations and entrenched power dynamics within Thailand itself.
At the immediate political level, the escalation appears closely tied to Thailand’s internal instability. The caretaker government, led by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, has come under mounting public scrutiny over alleged links to online scam networks, declining legitimacy, and an ineffective response to recent national disasters.
In this context, the sudden intensification of border hostilities resembles a familiar diversionary tactic—redirecting public anger outward and manufacturing a nationalist rallying point to deflect domestic pressure.
This short-term political manoeuvring reflects the narrow interests of a small political clique rather than the long-term interests of the Thai people or regional peace.
Personal ambition and power preservation have once again taken precedence over diplomacy, international law, and responsible statecraft.
Those responsible for initiating and sustaining acts of aggression must ultimately be held accountable under international law and the court of justice if we can still believe in it.
Beyond short-term political expediency, however, a deeper and more troubling agenda appears to be at play.
Within Thailand’s entrenched power establishment—particularly segments of the military and conservative elites—there remains a persistent ambition to reclaim so-called “lost territories” through unilateral interpretations of history and cartography.
These claims, based on Thailand’s own maps rather than internationally recognised boundaries, revive a dangerous logic of territorial revisionism.
Equally concerning is the apparent aspiration for regime change in Cambodia. The Cambodian leadership, particularly former Prime Minister Hun Sen, is perceived by hardline elements in Bangkok as a strategic obstacle—a veteran statesman and military strategist who commands domestic legitimacy and has successfully defended Cambodia’s sovereignty through diplomacy and international law.
This perception fuels a security narrative that seeks not coexistence, but subjugation.
Thai military rhetoric has only reinforced these concerns. Public statements referencing the “neutralisation” of Cambodian military capabilities and “pre-emptive strikes” signal an alarming readiness to escalate.
While Thailand has stopped short of formally declaring war, the scale, intensity, and unilateral nature of its actions increasingly resemble a de facto armed conflict.
Thailand may enjoy advantages in air power and heavy weaponry, including fighter jets and advanced military systems. Yet military superiority does not automatically translate into strategic success. Cambodia, operating from a defensive position, possesses significant geographical advantages and intimate knowledge of its terrain.
History repeatedly demonstrates that invading forces often underestimate the resilience of defenders fighting on their own soil.
More importantly, Cambodia holds the moral high ground. It is defending its internationally recognised sovereignty against external aggression.
The Cambodian people are united by a powerful national spirit rooted in the determination to protect their homeland at all costs. This collective resolve—anchored in legitimacy, justice, and cultural identity—constitutes a form of national strength that cannot be neutralised by military technology alone.
For Thailand’s power elites, the belief that Cambodia can be coerced, territorially dismembered, or politically destabilised is ultimately illusory. Such ambitions are not only unrealistic but profoundly destabilising for the region and deeply damaging to Thailand’s own international standing.
A test for ASEAN, international law, and humanity
The future trajectory of the conflict will depend not only on the actions of Thailand and Cambodia, but critically, on the response—or silence—of the international community, particularly ASEAN.
If sustained diplomatic pressure is not applied on Thailand to cease hostilities and return to dialogue grounded in international law, the conflict risks becoming prolonged, normalised, and increasingly destructive.
Inaction would be interpreted as tacit acceptance. History shows that unchecked aggression rarely de-escalates on its own; instead, it hardens positions and incentivises further escalation.
Without clear and collective pressure—from ASEAN, the United Nations, and key international partners—Thailand’s use of force is likely to continue, deepening human suffering while eroding the norms that underpin regional peace.
The primary victims of a prolonged conflict will not be political elites or military planners, but ordinary people on both sides of the border.
Civilians face displacement, economic disruption, loss of livelihoods, and psychological trauma. Border communities—already among the most vulnerable—bear the heaviest costs.
A prolonged war would constitute a tragedy for humanity, measured not only in material destruction but in lives broken and futures stolen.
For ASEAN, the stakes are existential. Allowing hostilities to persist would represent a direct backlash against international law and a severe blow to ASEAN’s foundational principles, including peaceful dispute settlement, non-use of force, and respect for sovereignty as enshrined in the ASEAN Charter and the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation.
ASEAN’s credibility as a rules-based community cannot survive if one member state is permitted to use military force against another without consequence.
Failure to act decisively would reinforce a dangerous perception: that power, not law, determines outcomes in Southeast Asia. Such a precedent would undermine decades of ASEAN Community-building and weaken ASEAN centrality at a time when the region is already under intense strain from major-power rivalry.
The erosion of legal norms in Southeast Asia would also have global implications. It would embolden unilateralism, normalise coercion, and further weaken the already fragile international rules-based order. Small and middle states—whose security depends disproportionately on international law—would be left increasingly exposed in a more lawless world.
Preventing this outcome requires urgent and coordinated action. ASEAN must reaffirm its role not as a passive observer, but as an active guarantor of regional peace.
The global community must make clear that aggression carries political, diplomatic, and reputational costs.
De-escalation, dialogue, and recourse to legal mechanisms are not optional—they are the only viable path to preventing further suffering and preserving regional stability.
Finally, this moment calls for reflection within Thai society itself. Thailand’s rich culture, diplomatic tradition, and international reputation should not be sacrificed at the altar of militarism and elite power politics.
The Thai people deserve a future shaped by civilian leadership, democratic accountability, and peaceful coexistence with neighbours—not one dictated by force.
True security does not come from aggression and expansionism. It comes from restraint, respect for international law, and the courage to confront internal challenges without exporting them across borders."
https://www.khmertimeskh.com/501811134/ ... -cambodia/
A captured Thai armoured personnel carrier. Supplied
The unfolding developments along the Cambodia-Thailand border raise a fundamental question: what is Thailand’s true endgame in escalating aggression against Cambodia?
Viewed objectively, Thailand’s actions amount to a unilateral use of force driven less by legitimate security concerns or self-defence than by domestic political calculations and entrenched power dynamics within Thailand itself.
At the immediate political level, the escalation appears closely tied to Thailand’s internal instability. The caretaker government, led by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, has come under mounting public scrutiny over alleged links to online scam networks, declining legitimacy, and an ineffective response to recent national disasters.
In this context, the sudden intensification of border hostilities resembles a familiar diversionary tactic—redirecting public anger outward and manufacturing a nationalist rallying point to deflect domestic pressure.
This short-term political manoeuvring reflects the narrow interests of a small political clique rather than the long-term interests of the Thai people or regional peace.
Personal ambition and power preservation have once again taken precedence over diplomacy, international law, and responsible statecraft.
Those responsible for initiating and sustaining acts of aggression must ultimately be held accountable under international law and the court of justice if we can still believe in it.
Beyond short-term political expediency, however, a deeper and more troubling agenda appears to be at play.
Within Thailand’s entrenched power establishment—particularly segments of the military and conservative elites—there remains a persistent ambition to reclaim so-called “lost territories” through unilateral interpretations of history and cartography.
These claims, based on Thailand’s own maps rather than internationally recognised boundaries, revive a dangerous logic of territorial revisionism.
Equally concerning is the apparent aspiration for regime change in Cambodia. The Cambodian leadership, particularly former Prime Minister Hun Sen, is perceived by hardline elements in Bangkok as a strategic obstacle—a veteran statesman and military strategist who commands domestic legitimacy and has successfully defended Cambodia’s sovereignty through diplomacy and international law.
This perception fuels a security narrative that seeks not coexistence, but subjugation.
Thai military rhetoric has only reinforced these concerns. Public statements referencing the “neutralisation” of Cambodian military capabilities and “pre-emptive strikes” signal an alarming readiness to escalate.
While Thailand has stopped short of formally declaring war, the scale, intensity, and unilateral nature of its actions increasingly resemble a de facto armed conflict.
Thailand may enjoy advantages in air power and heavy weaponry, including fighter jets and advanced military systems. Yet military superiority does not automatically translate into strategic success. Cambodia, operating from a defensive position, possesses significant geographical advantages and intimate knowledge of its terrain.
History repeatedly demonstrates that invading forces often underestimate the resilience of defenders fighting on their own soil.
More importantly, Cambodia holds the moral high ground. It is defending its internationally recognised sovereignty against external aggression.
The Cambodian people are united by a powerful national spirit rooted in the determination to protect their homeland at all costs. This collective resolve—anchored in legitimacy, justice, and cultural identity—constitutes a form of national strength that cannot be neutralised by military technology alone.
For Thailand’s power elites, the belief that Cambodia can be coerced, territorially dismembered, or politically destabilised is ultimately illusory. Such ambitions are not only unrealistic but profoundly destabilising for the region and deeply damaging to Thailand’s own international standing.
A test for ASEAN, international law, and humanity
The future trajectory of the conflict will depend not only on the actions of Thailand and Cambodia, but critically, on the response—or silence—of the international community, particularly ASEAN.
If sustained diplomatic pressure is not applied on Thailand to cease hostilities and return to dialogue grounded in international law, the conflict risks becoming prolonged, normalised, and increasingly destructive.
Inaction would be interpreted as tacit acceptance. History shows that unchecked aggression rarely de-escalates on its own; instead, it hardens positions and incentivises further escalation.
Without clear and collective pressure—from ASEAN, the United Nations, and key international partners—Thailand’s use of force is likely to continue, deepening human suffering while eroding the norms that underpin regional peace.
The primary victims of a prolonged conflict will not be political elites or military planners, but ordinary people on both sides of the border.
Civilians face displacement, economic disruption, loss of livelihoods, and psychological trauma. Border communities—already among the most vulnerable—bear the heaviest costs.
A prolonged war would constitute a tragedy for humanity, measured not only in material destruction but in lives broken and futures stolen.
For ASEAN, the stakes are existential. Allowing hostilities to persist would represent a direct backlash against international law and a severe blow to ASEAN’s foundational principles, including peaceful dispute settlement, non-use of force, and respect for sovereignty as enshrined in the ASEAN Charter and the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation.
ASEAN’s credibility as a rules-based community cannot survive if one member state is permitted to use military force against another without consequence.
Failure to act decisively would reinforce a dangerous perception: that power, not law, determines outcomes in Southeast Asia. Such a precedent would undermine decades of ASEAN Community-building and weaken ASEAN centrality at a time when the region is already under intense strain from major-power rivalry.
The erosion of legal norms in Southeast Asia would also have global implications. It would embolden unilateralism, normalise coercion, and further weaken the already fragile international rules-based order. Small and middle states—whose security depends disproportionately on international law—would be left increasingly exposed in a more lawless world.
Preventing this outcome requires urgent and coordinated action. ASEAN must reaffirm its role not as a passive observer, but as an active guarantor of regional peace.
The global community must make clear that aggression carries political, diplomatic, and reputational costs.
De-escalation, dialogue, and recourse to legal mechanisms are not optional—they are the only viable path to preventing further suffering and preserving regional stability.
Finally, this moment calls for reflection within Thai society itself. Thailand’s rich culture, diplomatic tradition, and international reputation should not be sacrificed at the altar of militarism and elite power politics.
The Thai people deserve a future shaped by civilian leadership, democratic accountability, and peaceful coexistence with neighbours—not one dictated by force.
True security does not come from aggression and expansionism. It comes from restraint, respect for international law, and the courage to confront internal challenges without exporting them across borders."
https://www.khmertimeskh.com/501811134/ ... -cambodia/
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
It's interesting that the author of this article claims to be viewing the situation objectively, although he/she starts the article by claiming that Thailand's actions amount to a "unilateral" use of force - when in fact both sides are using force against each other. I agree that there's a lot to question about how both sides are contributing to this conflict, but it's definately not unilateral.
This doesn't surprise me at all considering it's Khmer news media. It would be like reading an article in TASS (Moscow) to learn about the facts regarding the war in Ukraine.
Cambodia seems ignorant of the fact that Thailand has access to satellite reconnaissance photographs with third-party monitoring that show where the missiles are being launched from...what geographical area's in Thailand are being targeted by those missiles, as well as, damage inflicted. Not to mention the 200,000 Thais who have fled their villages along the border to avoid becoming casualties.
Re: The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute
Well, the Thai media is biased, as is the Cambodian media.
We get regular Bangkok Post articles posted here, so for balance, I add a few from the other side.
Currently, Thailand seems to be using overwhelming military superiority to gain territory. Which was probably the plan all along. With the military free from any political control.
And here's an article from a left wing British newspaper, complete with some maps. A rare attempt at proper journalism.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/ ... re_btn_url
We get regular Bangkok Post articles posted here, so for balance, I add a few from the other side.
Currently, Thailand seems to be using overwhelming military superiority to gain territory. Which was probably the plan all along. With the military free from any political control.
And here's an article from a left wing British newspaper, complete with some maps. A rare attempt at proper journalism.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/ ... re_btn_url