In this case, you were an individual paying a modest amount of money to solve a problem directly affecting you & you alone.
Someone paying the police to solve the Arab problem is less likely, as that's a problem shared by all residents. So for one person to make the entire payment would be perceived as "unfair". Establishing a collective fund and trusting people not to steal the cash is more difficult.
Are there examples of groups paying to ensure proper policing ?
This has been answered before.Gaybutton wrote: ↑Mon Aug 04, 2025 7:55 pm I might buy into your theory about tea money explaining why the motorbike maniacs get away with it year after year as soon as you, or someone, will answer the question I've asked many times, but have yet to see anyone address it: If tea money is what keeps this happening year after year, then who is paying who, and why?
The motorcycle rental shops would probably have to pay if there was any illegal activity, such as renting to those without a proper license.
If the police held motorcycles "hostage" after the few arrests they make, again, it might be a tea money situation.
They could directly collect tea money off the Arabs for various offences.
So that's three examples.
Finally, policing fast moving targets is hard work. Why do that when they can spend time managing their portfolio of static bribe paying businesses ?
Of course I can't be sure I have the right answer.
On the other hand I see no reason to assume that this is the only illegal activity in town where the police don't collect bribes.