Thailand #6 Among Countries With Smallest Penises

[KeithAmbrose]

I agree with the comments, and just wanted to comment on Cambodia coming last, so to speak. I have met over 20 boys from Cambodia, and all comfortably exceeded the quoted figure by some margin! Also they were great sex!

[Dodger]

These types of surveys are totally bogus as far as I'm concerned, and listing the average erect penis size for Thais to be 4.51 inches is proof of that.

I don't know what their sample size was but I can guarantee you it isn't anywhere close to the samples I've taken - and I put the average erect penis size for Thais @ 5.25 inches (range = 4.25 - 6.25). They must be confusing Thailand with S. Korea.

[Gaybutton]

These types of surveys are totally bogus as far as I'm concerned

Me too. Not only do I not trust the so-called information, I don't understand the point of it even if it is truly genuine. As thewayhelooks wrote in an earlier post, "Who cares?"

Is anyone besides me old enough to remember Senator William Proxmire and his Golden Fleece awards given for money spent and wasted on frivolous projects and studies? One of my favorites was US $84,000 spent on research to find out why people fall in love.

Proxmire's response:

I object to this not only because no one—not even the National Science Foundation—can argue that falling in love is a science; not only because I'm sure that even if they spend $84 million or $84 billion they wouldn't get an answer that anyone would believe. I'm also against it because I don't want the answer. I believe that 200 million other Americans want to leave some things in life a mystery, and right on top of the things we don't want to know is why a man falls in love with a woman and vice versa.

If as much as one dollar was spent on this "research" it certainly would get my vote for a Golden Fleece award.

Even if I gave a damn about the results of such a survey, which I don't, I approve of Dodger's method of doing the research. Who knows, maybe that's just how it was done . . .

[Jun]

Me too. Not only do I not trust the so-called information, I don't understand the point of it even if it is truly genuine. As thewayhelooks wrote in an earlier post, "Who cares?"

People lap up trash like this.

I couldn't quite bring myself to click on the You Tube link, but here is the link to the actual data: https://www.worlddata.info/average-penissize.php

At the top, they state "No other topic on this website has been asked for more often than the average size of male genitalia".

Oddly enough, it's also the busiest thread here at present.

[RichLB]

Surprisingly, until the last couple hundred years the smaller the penis the more attractive the male body was considered to be. That's why the Greek sculptured male nudes (including David) were always under hung using Western gay male standards. I have no clue how accurate such an observation might be since my data only comes from some documentary (the name of which I've forgotten) found on the internet.

[Dodger]

Surprisingly, until the last couple hundred years the smaller the penis the more attractive the male body was considered to be. That's why the Greek sculptured male nudes (including David) were always under hung using Western gay male standards.

Well that answers that.

I always wondered why the sculptures of those old Greek statues didn't carve out some nice 8 inch salami's.

[Gaybutton]

I always wondered why the sculptures of those old Greek statues didn't carve out some nice 8 inch salami's.

The answer to that is obvious. Salamis are Italian, not Greek. For Greek they would have to carve out souvlaki.

Of course, Michaelangelo's David, along with everything else Michaelangelo did - Italian . . .

[Dodger]

The Greeks believed (and maybe still do) that "women were for having babies and boys were for having fun". Interesting that all their statues depict the body of a "Man" but the penis of a "Boy"...

[Gaybutton]

The Greeks believed (and maybe still do) that ". . . boys were for having fun".

In that case, see you at the Parthenon . . .