The Antonin Scalia mindset

[Gaybutton]

Scalia talks about the devil, "Duck Dynasty" and knowing when to retire

In a wide-ranging interview with New York Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia shared his insight into the influence of the devil in society, how he ended up watching an episode of the popular A&E show "Duck Dynasty," and how he'll know when to retire from his life term on the high court.

After 27 years on the court, Scalia is its longest-serving member and a strict constitutional originalist. He's known for the rhetorical flourishes he adds to his court opinions; in his scathing dissent in United States v. Windsor, he wrote that the majority opinion striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act amounted to "legalistic argle-bargle."

Scalia told New York Magazine's Jennifer Senior, "I'm not a hater of homosexuals at all." However, he added, "I still think it's Catholic teaching that it's wrong. Okay? But I don't hate the people that engage in it. In my legal opinions, all I've said is that I don't think the Constitution requires the people to adopt one view or the other."

If public opinion about homosexuality and its place in society is going to change, he continued, "it should change democratically, and not at the ukase of a Supreme Court."

The justice said he wasn't concerned about how his position would impact his legacy.

"Maybe the world is spinning toward a wider acceptance of homosexual rights, and here's Scalia, standing athwart it," he said. "At least standing athwart it as a constitutional entitlement. But I have never been custodian of my legacy. When I'm dead and gone, I'll either be sublimely happy or terribly unhappy."

Scalia told Senior that he believes in heaven and hell and like "every Catholic," believes that the devil is "a real person." The devil isn't as conspicuous in society as he once was, Scalia said, because "he got wilier" and now advances his agenda by "getting people not to believe in him or in God."

While isn't concerned about his legacy, Scalia says he has wondered whether he could now write a court opinion as well as he did in the 1980s.

"You always wonder whether you're losing your grip and whether your current opinions are not as good as your old ones," said the 77-year-old, who was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986. He added he'll know when it's time to retire "when I'm not hitting on all eight cylinders." Additionally, he said he'll know it's time to retire when he doesn't enjoy his job as much as he does.

"I think that's the beginning of the end," he said. "I was worried lately about the fact that the job seems easier. That I really don't have to put in the excessively long hours that I used to. I still work hard. But it does seem easier than it used to... But after due reflection, I've decided the reason it's getting easier is because so many of the cases that come before us present the issue of whether we should extend one of the opinions from the previous 27 years that I've been here, which I dissented from in the first place!"

Scalia bemoaned the "coarseness" of modern society, particularly when it comes to manners.

"You can't go to a movie--or watch a television show for that matter--without hearing the constant use of the F-word--including, you know, ladies using it," he said. "People that I know don't talk like that! But if you portray it a lot, the society's going to become that way. It's very sad."

Scalia said he doesn't follow pop culture closely, though he did watch an episode of "Duck Dynasty," which follows a family that runs a duck call business, since he is a hunter and has used duck calls. The one television show he did say he enjoys is "Seinfeld."

"In fact, I got some CDs of 'Seinfeld,'" he said. "Seinfeld was hilarious. Oh, boy. The Nazi soup kitchen? No soup for you!"

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-576 ... to-retire/

[Canadien]

I recently sent this letter to Scalia:

Antonin Scalia
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543

Scalia,

Without doubt, you are a disgrace to humanity and should never have been appointed to the Court. How you escaped the fate of Robert Bork is beyond me and many others.

You have surpassed Rush Limbaugh as a joke when you speak because you fail to use good judicial reason and honesty in your comments. There is no one case that can be used to show this because you have done it in all cases of late. A buffoon would best describe your present status on the Court. Certainly most of the other members of the court see this and shun you, save for your boy Clarence Thomas.

What has turned you into this evil creature that appears hell-bent on a full advocacy of the conservative agenda? Have you lost your ability to know right from wrong?

Please cease to embarrass America and resign from the court immediately.

[Bob]

I recently sent this letter to Scalia:
you fail to use good judicial reason and honesty in your comments. .....save for your boy Clarence Thomas. ....Please cease to embarrass America and resign from the court immediately.

I regularly and vehemently disagree with Scalia's approach to various issues and I frankly generally detest Thomas' performance (or lack thereof) on the Court; that being said:
(1) You've either never read or never understood Scalia's opinions. Nobody on the Court has suggested Scalia doesn't use good or valid legal logic.
(2) Your "cease to embarrass" line would more aptly apply to your uncalled-for reference to Clarence Thomas as a "boy."