Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Anything and everything about Thailand
User avatar
Jun
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 200 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Jun »

Gaybutton wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:11 am Folks, now instead of softly suggesting staying out of Bangkok for the time being, the air pollution problem has reached a crisis level and I am telling you in no uncertain terms, please stay away from Bangkok until the problem has subsided and brought under control.
The AQI is 160 in Silom
There are no readings for Pattaya, but inland, it's 154 and in Rayong it's over 160
Where I am, elsewhere in Thailand, it"s also around 160.

Admittedly, it's over 200 in parts of Bangkok, but not anywhere most of us would want to stay.

Incidentally, there's a big air quality meter by the beach in Pattaya. My own PM2.5 readings were significantly higher than those on display there. That's odd, as my meter correlates quite well with most other readings I see. So I suspect their data is fiddled. Telling the truth might not promote tourism.
User avatar
Gaybutton
Posts: 23443
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1550 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Gaybutton »

Jun wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 8:54 am I suspect their data is fiddled.
Perhaps, but it could also mean their equipment is faulty and no maintenance to check or repair it.

Either way, obviously something is wrong.
User avatar
Gaybutton
Posts: 23443
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1550 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Gaybutton »

Air quality in all parts of Bangkok below the safety standard

by THE NATION

January 26, 2025

Average PM2.5 on Saturday morning at nearly double the acceptable levels

The air quality in all of Bangkok’s metropolitan areas exceeded the safety standard on Saturday morning, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA)’s Air Quality Information Centre said.

The centre reported the average PM2.5 levels throughout the city on Saturday at 73.4 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3), nearly double the country’s standard of 37.5µg/m3 over a three-hour average (5am to 7am).

PM2.5 refers to dust particles 2.5 micrometres or less in diameter, long-term exposure to which is linked with chronic diseases including lung and heart problems.

Major sources of PM2.5 include traffic emissions, factories, forest fires, and burning of harvest leftovers.

Average PM2.5 on Saturday morning at nearly double the acceptable levels

The air quality in all of Bangkok’s metropolitan areas exceeded the safety standard on Saturday morning, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA)’s Air Quality Information Centre said.

The centre reported the average PM2.5 levels throughout the city on Saturday at 73.4 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3), nearly double the country’s standard of 37.5µg/m3 over a three-hour average (5am to 7am).

PM2.5 refers to dust particles 2.5 micrometres or less in diameter, long-term exposure to which is linked with chronic diseases including lung and heart problems.

Major sources of PM2.5 include traffic emissions, factories, forest fires, and burning of harvest leftovers.

https://www.nationthailand.com/thailand ... k/40045540
_____________________________
Air pollution hits regional agenda

Govt aims to 'mitigate' burning in neighbouring countries

January 26, 2025

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has raised the status of the PM2.5 problem from a national agenda item to an issue requiring Asean cooperation to solve.

Speaking to reporters after returning from the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, Ms Paetongtarn said the escalating crisis is no longer just a national concern.

Some countries in the region are facing cross-border pollution problems as well.

Ms Paetongtarn said Foreign Affairs Minister Maris Sangiampongsa has been asked to negotiate with Asean countries to address the issue under existing frameworks.

Collaborative efforts to mitigate agricultural burning in Thailand and neighbouring countries have been discussed, she said. Thai authorities have rolled out preventive measures, including penalties for agricultural burning, since November last year, she added.

She said tackling the issue also required the participation of Asean countries. "This is not just the responsibility of one person or one country. Everyone must contribute to creating great power [to help solve the PM2.5 problem]."

Immediate actions were being taken to alleviate pollution levels, while mid- and long-term strategies are in place, she says.

When asked about implementing a work-from-home policy nationwide, she was open to the idea, saying employees who can work remotely without disrupting company operations may help reduce traffic-related emissions.

Further talks would be held with government agencies on whether they can issue directives on remote work. Responding to public criticism over her attendance at WEF during the air pollution crisis in Thailand, Ms Paetongtarn defended herself by saying that preparations to address the PM2.5 issue were put in place long before her departure for the event.

"Of course, when the air is full of dust, we can't just snap our fingers to make it disappear. We've prepared as much as we can, putting in our full effort," she said. "It just so happens the event coincided with a period of high dust levels. We couldn't change the date of the WEF."

Government spokesman Jirayu Houngsub on Saturday said Ms Paetongtarn had closely followed up her directives to address PM2.5 following her return from the WEF.

She also instructed the National Disaster Management Command Headquarters to adopt the model deployed by the Operation Centre for Flood and Landslide Victims, which helped address flood problems late last year, to monitor air pollution and provide aid.

A committee on PM2.5 combat has been formed by Interior Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, who leads the Command Headquarters.

It comprises several high-level officials who were members of the committee overseeing the Operation Centre for Flood and Landslide Victims, with daily meetings scheduled.

Air quality in Bangkok remains dire, with 23 areas classified as "red zones" due to unsafe PM2.5 levels on Saturday. The Bangkok Metropolitan Region recorded dust levels ranging from 50.9 to 111 microgrammes per cubic metre, exceeding safety thresholds set at 37.5 µg/m³.

High levels were also detected in other regions, especially the Central region, with dust levels as high as 106.9 µg/m³.

https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... nal-agenda
User avatar
Jun
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 200 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Jun »

Bangkok Post wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:56 amShe said tackling the issue also required the participation of Asean countries. "This is not just the responsibility of one person or one country. Everyone must contribute to creating great power [to help solve the PM2.5 problem]."
1 Most of the pollution in Thailand is probably from Thailand. I think we already worked that out from regional variations and wind direction last year.

2 How can Thailand ask neighbouring countries to improve, whilst doing very little to fix Thai pollution?

The PM2.5 reading is 123 where I am at present.
User avatar
Gaybutton
Posts: 23443
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1550 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Gaybutton »

Jun wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:27 am The PM2.5 reading is 123 where I am at present.
Not good. You don't have to reveal where you are if you prefer not to, but can you tell us if you are in or near Bangkok?

"I would prefer not to."
Barlleby in Herman Melville's 'Bartleby the Scrivener'
User avatar
Jun
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 200 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Jun »

Gaybutton wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:45 pm Not good. You don't have to reveal where you are if you prefer not to, but can you tell us if you are in or near Bangkok?
I'm about 4 hours from Bangkok. There are a lot of people coughing.

I caught a light cold about a week ago. I feel absolutely fine, except for having to blow my nose about every 2 minutes. I'm starting to think the pollution might be contributing to that symptom.

As for PM2.5, the WHO average annual "safe" concentration is 5 μg/m3.
I measured 123 outside my hotel.
I'm currently in a coffee shop which must filter the air, as the reading is 22.
User avatar
Gaybutton
Posts: 23443
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1550 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Gaybutton »

Unsafe air in 58 of 77 Thai provinces

January 26, 2025

Unsafe levels of toxic ultrafine dust were detected in 58 out of 77 provinces in Thailand, with the worst air pollution detected in the Central Plain on Sunday morning.

The Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Gistda) reported at 10am that particulate matter 2.5 micrometres and less in diameter (PM2.5) was at red (hazardous-to-health) levels in 20 provinces.

The highest level of PM2.5, 109.7 microgrammes per cubic metre of air over the past 24 hours, was recorded in Sing Buri province.

It was followed by 108.5µg/m³ in Chai Nat, 94.4µg/m³ in Lop Buri, 91.2 in Nakhon Sawan, 88.3 in Saraburi, 86 in Uthai Thani and Kamphaeng Phet, 85.9 in Prachin Buri, 83.3 in Khon Kaen, Chaiyaphum and Nong Bua Lam Phu, 82.7 in Chachoengsao, 82.5 in Ang Thong, 81.7 in Phetchabun, 80.9 in Nakhon Ratchasima, 80.5 in Sa Kaeo, 79.5 in Phichit, 77.6 in Sukhothai, 77.4 in Loei and 75.4 in Chonburi (Pattaya's province).

The safe threshold is at 37.5µg/m³.

Safe air was reported in 19 provinces, including 10 at yellow levels of PM2.5 ranging from 26.3 to 34.2µg/m³ (moderate air quality). In ascending order, they were Narathiwat, Mae Hong Son, Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Sonkhla, Phatthalung, Yala, Pattani, Trat and Lamphun.

Nine others, in the South, had good (green-level) air quality with PM2.5 levels ranging from 15.2 to 24.9µg/m³. In ascending order, they were Krabi, Phuket, Phangnga, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Satun, Surat Thani, Ranong, Chumphon and Trang.

The 38 remaining provinces recorded orange levels (starting to affect health), with PM2.5 ranging from 39.8 to 73.7µg/m³. They included Greater Bangkok.

https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/ge ... -provinces
User avatar
Jun
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 200 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Jun »

Bangkok Post wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:55 pmThe safe threshold is at 37.5µg/m³.
Or 5µg/m³ according to the WHO.

Note how many of the worst provinces are not adjacent to other countries. So it's Thai pollution causing the problem.

There are a lot of people wearing masks around here.
User avatar
Jun
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 200 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Jun »

Pollution seems to have reduced according to AQI and my meter.

I tool a train trip today. The PM2.5 readings were around 20 in the countryside. With some fluctuation, for instance it went up to 50 as we crossed a motorway. Or over 150 on the outskirts of Nakhon Ratchasima.
Try blaming that on neighbouring countries..

Free MRT in Bangkok. So lots of customers at what would normally be a quiet time of day.
I saw what looked like a police road block. I thought they might have been making emissions checks, but then a very smokey motorcycle went past.
User avatar
Jun
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 200 times

Re: Toxic smog returns to Greater Bangkok

Post by Jun »

PM 2.5 readings around 60~70 in the Pattaya area today.

I've just stopped in one of the few coffee shops that has air filters. The reading is about 23, despite a large space, doors with huge gaps and a door open to an adjacent room with no filters visible. The output from one filter is under 10, so I'm sure they could get the whole room below 10 with some basic sealing.

I met another delightful lad yesterday. A graduate in a subject of some relevance to this topic.
He reckons he and all his room mates are coughing due to the air pollution.
I'm sure that's a big factor with me and all the other people coughing too.
Post Reply