Big Brother is watching - or at least trying to

Anything and everything about Thailand
Post Reply
User avatar
Gaybutton
Posts: 21549
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1313 times

Big Brother is watching - or at least trying to

Post by Gaybutton »

My favorite line in the article is the last line - and truer words were never spoken. And it could be applied to just about everything else in Pattaya that could use some maintenance, but never gets it.

"With the new rental contract, Pattaya’s crack engineers no longer will be tasked with doing what they’ve proven time and time again they’re incapable of: maintenance."
___________________________________________________________________

Pattaya ends ugly, year-long fight over CCTV cameras with new rental contract

By Jetsada Homklin

July 13, 2022

Nearly a year after the Pattaya City Council collapsed after an acrimonious fight over a CCTV contract, the city’s newly elected leaders agreed to pay more than 136 million baht to rent cameras.

At its July 11 meeting, the city council approved a three-year deal worth 136.8 million baht to hire an outside contractor for rental and maintenance of cameras to be installed in 940 places to aid crime-solving.

The council vote brings to a close, for now, to a long-running battle over closed-circuit television cameras that caused half of the previous council to resign in August last year.

Then-council Chairman Anan Angkanawisai announced the dissolution of the panel Aug. 13 following the resignations of Wasan Naowniew, Chakorn Kanjawattana, Saksit Yaemsri and Choluek Chotekamjorn who comprised half of the eight remaining members of the council, which originally had 12 members appointed by the previous junta in 2016. With fewer than the six required members, the council was automatically dissolved.

Poramet’s predecessor, Sonthaya Kunplome, implied at the time that the controversy was fueled by the unusual actions of Anan, who pushed vigorously for a 200-million-baht payment to an undisclosed company for the same 940 cameras, but only for one year.

Sonthaya said Wasan, Chakorn, Saksit and Choluek – all of whom previously held high administrative officers or worked in the legal system – objected. But Anan pressed on, putting the matter to a secret-ballot vote. The four men objected again, saying the council bylaws only allow secret ballots on matters pertaining to the monarchy.

Anan over-rode the objections, but the vote failed 4-4. Then the chairman set aside the vote, putting it on the agenda again for Aug. 13. The four men resigned amid the stench of corruption.

Pattaya’s history with CCTV cameras has been disastrous, with the city spending more than a billion baht over the past decade or so on cameras they fail to maintain, leaving the city’s security system in such poor repair that city and regional police publicly condemned city hall and even offered to pay for new ones.

With the new rental contract, Pattaya’s crack engineers no longer will be tasked with doing what they’ve proven time and time again they’re incapable of: maintenance.

https://www.pattayamail.com/news/pattay ... act-403808
Dodger
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:58 am
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 490 times

Re: Big Brother is watching - or at least trying to

Post by Dodger »

As far as I'm concerned this one sentence from the article says it all:

"......the controversy was fueled by the unusual actions of Anan, who pushed vigorously for a 200-million-baht payment to an undisclosed company".

The only problem I have with that sentence is the use of the word "unusual".
User avatar
Gaybutton
Posts: 21549
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1313 times

Re: Big Brother is watching - or at least trying to

Post by Gaybutton »

Dodger wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 8:39 am pushed vigorously for a 200-million-baht payment to an undisclosed company".
Why does the phrase "somebody's brother-in-law" come to mind . . . ?

Surely there is no corruption. After all, they would never even consider doing anything dishonest . . .
Post Reply