No more Walking Street?

Anything and everything about Thailand
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 17628
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Thailand
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 900 times

No more Walking Street?

Post by Gaybutton »

I wish I could understand this obsession by a few prudes to turn Pattaya into a "family oriented" city. Why? Maybe I'm wrong, but in my opinion that is the worst thing that the powers-that-be could do.

Pattaya revives 25-year battle to demolish Walking Street

June 13, 2020

Every few years, Pattaya officials contemplate tearing down Walking Street’s seedy bars and replacing them with a natural, family-friendly attraction. While a high-season river of cash used to wash away such thoughts, the nightlife strip’s current shutdown has administrators rethinking their options again.

That was the backdrop for a June 11 meeting where architects presented renderings and master-plan ideas for an all new walking street, where trees supplant chrome poles and where cruise ships dock where Bali Hai Pier is now.

Pattaya officials are keen to grab as much of the government’s Eastern Economic Corridor cash buffet as possible and are throwing as many lavish, big-budget ideas at the wall as they can come up, hoping one sticks and the cash lands in their pockets.

Thus Thursday’s presentations were filled with grand ideas for monorails, cruise terminals and waterfront parks built on landfill extending from Walking Street’s current western side.

All of this, of course, would be connected to the expanded U-Tapao-Rayong-Pattaya Airport by a mythical high-speed train, with all of it in place by 2025.

With Pattaya unable to lay new sewage pipes in Naklua within the promised year, few are confident in the schedule for any grander plans. Then there is the matter of the expectations that Thailand’s economy will shrink by 7 percent in 2020, plunging the country into recession by year-end.

The idea last reared its head in 2016 when Walking Street property owners again successfully thwarted a move to demolish up to half of the nightlife district due to public-land encroachment, a battle that has been raging for 25 years.

At the second public hearing on the 1.5-billion-baht proposal to redevelop the waterfront side of Walking Street into a public park, property owners presented rafts of documents they claimed were legal property and land deeds and demanded their authenticity be investigated before any further action on the redevelopment plan occurs.

The issue died there.

As early as 1988, 101 structures were deemed to be encroaching on public land and targeted for demolition. But the impact on tourism that demolishing so many of the bars and restaurants would have repeatedly has scuttled any action.

A royal decree on land expropriation issued April 17, 2014 confirmed the findings of the 1998 Japan International Cooperation Agency report. But owners of those properties, including some of Pattaya’s wealthiest and politically connected families, stalled any move to demolish the buildings even as Walking Street grew into Pattaya’s best-known and most-lucrative tourist attraction. (PCPR)

Story and graphics: ... eet-303891

User avatar
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: No more Walking Street?

Post by ceejay »

I' be sorry to see it go. One of my earliest memories of Thailand is going out on the morning of my very first ever day in the country and going down Walking Street. I was looking for postcards to send back to England (it was a long time ago). Near to the Bali Hai pier end, which was much less developed than now, I found a tiny tailors shop, run by an elderly Sikh gentleman, who sold postcards as a sideline. He even sold the stamps and posted them for me.
As I was writing out the cards, we had quite a pleasant little chat. When I left he gave me his card and said I could go back to be measured for a suit if I wanted - but he did not press me to buy anything. You wouldn't get that now.

Post Reply