The Royal Wedding
Re: The Royal Wedding
The bishop's rant, I mean sermon, gave me time for a toilet break and to prepare a meal.
- Undaunted
- Posts: 2576
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2016 8:47 am
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 368 times
Re: The Royal Wedding
windwalker wrote:The bishop's rant, I mean sermon, gave me time for a toilet break and to prepare a meal.
"In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king"
- Gaybutton
- Posts: 21643
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Thailand
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
-
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:40 pm
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: The Royal Wedding
Meaning just what?thewayhelooks wrote:Once a scrubber, always a scrubber, despite her posh name.
- Undaunted
- Posts: 2576
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2016 8:47 am
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 368 times
Re: The Royal Wedding
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... m=scrubberwindwalker wrote:Meaning just what?thewayhelooks wrote:Once a scrubber, always a scrubber, despite her posh name.
"In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king"
Re: The Royal Wedding
Yes, I understand "scrubber" but to whom is he referring? That is a question for thewayhelooks.
Re: The Royal Wedding
Well Becks could certainly play football, however I still have difficulty with the idea of people with tattoos on the neck, even if they are otherwise good characters.Captain Swing wrote:I watched it all. It was a beautiful day, despite the best efforts of Victoria "Maleficent" Beckham to summon the dark forces of the underworld. What is that bitch's problem? Has anyone ever seen her smile? And her husband seems so nice!
One could not imagine many family members at the event with tattoos. One thing they get right.
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:12 pm
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: The Royal Wedding
I agree with your distaste for tattoos, especially those as egregious as Beckham's, but I somehow like him anyway, Maybe I feel sorry for him, married to that wretch and probably afraid to leave her. They have a bunch of apparently appealing kids too. Evidently the Royals are OK with tattoos too; I read that tattoos are acceptable at Royal Ascot, which has a very strict dress code. And the Royals in the past had members in the Navy, where tattoos are something of a tradition. (I write all this as an American who probably has no idea what he's talking about). Besides, they had more important issues to overcome at the wedding than Beckham's tattoos.Jun wrote:One could not imagine many family members at the event with tattoos. One thing they get right.